Ep. 330: When pastors should or should not defend themselves
Brian Croft and Jim Savastio explore when pastors should and shouldn’t defend themselves against accusations. They trace biblical tensions (Jesus’ silence, Paul’s defenses), distinguish personal slights from ministerial slander, outline clear cases requiring defense (illegality, heresy, disqualifying charges), warn against chasing gossip and image-management, and urge humility, wise counsel, and prayerful discernment.
Contact us. We’d love to serve you
Request a stay at a Shepherd’s House Location
Give financially to support the work of helping pastors thrive
Write a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify
(01:45) Biblical Framework: when should/shouldn’t pastors defend themselves?
(03:40) Biblical tension: Jesus’ silence vs. Paul’s self-defense; key NT texts
(06:55) Proposed “template”: personal slights vs. ministerial slander; online smear story
(09:35) Important caveat: abuse, real guilt, and not helping guilty pastors “defend” themselves
(10:28) Clear cases to defend: disqualifying accusations (false romantic relationship story)
(13:09) Private vs. public accusations; defending against allegations of illegal activity
(15:05) Accusations of heresy and doctrinal error; how and why to respond
(19:18) How to defend without being defensive: tone, frequency, and using elders/outside counsel
(23:26) When not to defend: social media critique (“cesspool of wokeness”) and letting it go
(25:39) Critiques of preaching style/length and why not to publicly “answer from the pulpit”
(28:23) Lifestyle criticisms: vacations, cars, “nice things,” and unnecessary self-justification
(31:10) Vacation time example: fear of criticism and the paralysis of people-pleasing
(33:21) Don’t chase gossip; when silence is wiser than trying to correct every rumor
(34:12) Final counsel: humility, prayer, seeking counsel; closing prayer